Re: partition table read incorrectly

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2001 - 17:45:16 EST

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] FUSD v1.00: Framework for User-Space Devices"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"
In reply to: Wichert Akkerman: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Next in thread: Wichert Akkerman: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Reply: Wichert Akkerman: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If that bit is fine then how can it differ in opinion from fdisk?
>
> > The exact error would be good too
>
> I/O error: dev 08:11, sector 0

Nothing before or after it ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] FUSD v1.00: Framework for User-Space Devices"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Which is currently the most stable 2.4 kernel?"
In reply to: Wichert Akkerman: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Next in thread: Wichert Akkerman: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Reply: Wichert Akkerman: "Re: partition table read incorrectly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:24 EST