Re: QNX Scheduler patch

From: Anders Larsen (anders@alarsen.net)
Date: Mon Oct 01 2001 - 15:28:24 EST

Next message: Byron Stanoszek: "[Oops] on remounting root device in 2.4.9-ac10"
Previous message: Dave Cinege: "Re: [PATCH] invalidate buffers on blkdev_put"
In reply to: Dan Mann: "QNX Scheduler patch"
Next in thread: Remco Post: "Re: QNX Scheduler patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2001-10-01 18:19:28 +0200 Dan Mann wrote:
> Can anyone tell me about experience with the QNX scheduler patch done way
> back for kernel 2.0.31? I've been wanting to try it on a 2.4 series kernel
> (I'm looking for best possible interactive performance under X), and I want
> to know if it is worth porting to the 2.4 line.

You may wish to take a look at the Linux kernel preemption project at
http://kpreempt.sourceforge.net/ (official site, patch for 2.4.6)
http://tech9.net/rml/linux/ (bleeding edge, patch for 2.4.10+)

cheers
Anders
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Byron Stanoszek: "[Oops] on remounting root device in 2.4.9-ac10"
Previous message: Dave Cinege: "Re: [PATCH] invalidate buffers on blkdev_put"
In reply to: Dan Mann: "QNX Scheduler patch"
Next in thread: Remco Post: "Re: QNX Scheduler patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 21:00:16 EST