Re: Linux-2.4.10

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@cambridge.redhat.com)
Date: Sun Sep 23 2001 - 17:34:02 EST

Next message: Dan Hollis: "Re: do we need 10 copies?"
Previous message: Gergely Nagy: "Re: Linux-2.4.10 + ext3"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Linux-2.4.10"
Next in thread: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: Linux-2.4.10 - necessary patches"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

torvalds@transmeta.com said:
> In addition to the VM changes that have gotten so much attention there
> are architecture updates, various major filesystem updates (jffs2 and
> NTFS),

JFFS2 can't actually be built at the moment because the magic in
fs/Makefile and fs/Config.in appears to be absent. The fix for that is
about number 20 in the patchbomb I'm currently preparing.

The terminally impatient can find the whole patch, before I finish removing
some of the backward-compatibility crap, at
ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/people/dwmw2/mtd/mtd-diff-against-2.4.10-v2

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dan Hollis: "Re: do we need 10 copies?"
Previous message: Gergely Nagy: "Re: Linux-2.4.10 + ext3"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Linux-2.4.10"
Next in thread: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: Linux-2.4.10 - necessary patches"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:55 EST