Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Fri Sep 21 2001 - 08:01:08 EST

Next message: Eyal Lebedinsky: "[patch] 2.4.10-pre13: put_gendisk compile error"
Previous message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9"
In reply to: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:

> The really beautiful thing about it is that you can divide it
> completely in two parts:

> Your opinion?

I'll believe it when I see it, your idea is still very
abstract and I haven't seen you even start to talk about
even the data structures used in the implementation.

(except for "list" showing up at random places in the text)

regards,

Rik

-- IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Eyal Lebedinsky: "[patch] 2.4.10-pre13: put_gendisk compile error"
Previous message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9"
In reply to: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:43 EST