Re: Deadlock on the mm->mmap_sem

From: David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Sep 20 2001 - 02:05:57 EST


Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote:
> yes, one solution to the latency problem without writing the
> ugly code would be simply to add a per-process counter to pass to a
> modified rwsem api, then to hide the trickery in a mm_down_read macro.
> such way it will be recursive _and_ fair.

You'd need a counter per-process per-mm_struct. Otherwise you couldn't do a
recursive read lock simultaneously in two or more different processes, and
also allow any one process to lock multiple mm_structs.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:36 EST