> Anyway, in looking at SysRq loglevel handling in
> 2.4.9-ac (and 2.4.10-pre12), I see that it has been modified
> quite a bit. Looks extensible, which can be good.
> However, looking over it gave me several nagging questions
> and problems.
>
> 1. Was this stuff tested? How ???
Its been in the ac tree for about 6 months and in several distro shippings
> If someone (Crutcher ?) wants to patch it, that's fine.
> If I patched it, I would just add a
> next_loglevel = -1;
> at the beginning of __handle_sysrq_nolock() and then
> let the loglevel handler(s) set next_loglevel.
> If next_loglevel != -1 at the end of __handle_sysrq_nolock(),
> set console_loglevel to next_loglevel.
Send me a patch and cc Linus/Crutcher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:31 EST