On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> > It can be modified so that combination with lazy-bdev and pipefs-like tree
> > would work. And yes, most of the ugliness would just go away.
>
> That's the part I like about the page-cache bdev patch. It has a lot of
> fairly ugly warts, but all of them seem to be really fixable with _other_
> cleanups, at which point only the good parts remain.
It's actually quite broken in several areas (== bunch of panicable rmmod
races, broken wrt umount(), trivially oopsable in ioctl() on ramdisk,
very suspicious in swapoff(2), etc.). It _might_ be fixable, but I
would really like to see the patch that went into -pre11 separately from
the rest. Andrea, could you send it to me? In particular, I'm deeply
suspicious about changes in blkdev_put() in case of BDEV_FILE.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:31 EST