Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed still in -pre12

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Wed Sep 19 2001 - 10:16:13 EST

Next message: steve j. kondik: "encrypted swap on loop in 2.4.10-pre12?"
Previous message: Gergely Tamas: "Re: Re[2]: [PATCH] Athlon bug stomper. Pls apply."
In reply to: Martin MOKREJŠ: "__alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed still in -pre12"
Next in thread: Martin MOKREJŠ: "Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed still in -pre12"
Reply: Martin MOKREJŠ: "Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed still in -pre12"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, [iso-8859-2] Martin MOKREJŠ wrote:

> I tried 2.4.10-pre12

> I have to say I've been using for a week without any "0-order allocation
> failed" patch from Marcelo. Now I see am back to the old stage. ;(

Impossible, the VM code which is in 2.4.10-pre11 and newer
wasn't published until sunday night, so you can't have been
using it for a week already. ;)

cheers,

Rik

-- IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: steve j. kondik: "encrypted swap on loop in 2.4.10-pre12?"
Previous message: Gergely Tamas: "Re: Re[2]: [PATCH] Athlon bug stomper. Pls apply."
In reply to: Martin MOKREJŠ: "__alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed still in -pre12"
Next in thread: Martin MOKREJŠ: "Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed still in -pre12"
Reply: Martin MOKREJŠ: "Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed still in -pre12"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:30 EST