Re: /proc/partitions hosed in 2.4.9-ac10

From: Erik Andersen (andersen@codepoet.org)
Date: Mon Sep 17 2001 - 17:48:24 EST

Next message: Joseph Cheek: "disregard: Re: ide zip 100 won't mount"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: vm rewrite ready [Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9]"
In reply to: Colonel: "Re: /proc/partitions hosed in 2.4.9-ac10"
Next in thread: Robert Macaulay: "Re: /proc/partitions hosed in 2.4.9-ac10"
Reply: Robert Macaulay: "Re: /proc/partitions hosed in 2.4.9-ac10"
Reply: Hubert Mantel: "Re: /proc/partitions hosed in 2.4.9-ac10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon Sep 17, 2001 at 03:32:03PM -0700, Colonel wrote:
>
> Works fine here:

But none of your devices have 2048 byte physical sectors,
which is the case with my MO drives, and that appears to
be the root of the problem,

-Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen   email:  andersee@debian.org, formerly of Lineo
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Joseph Cheek: "disregard: Re: ide zip 100 won't mount"
Previous message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: vm rewrite ready [Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9]"
In reply to: Colonel: "Re: /proc/partitions hosed in 2.4.9-ac10"
Next in thread: Robert Macaulay: "Re: /proc/partitions hosed in 2.4.9-ac10"
Reply: Robert Macaulay: "Re: /proc/partitions hosed in 2.4.9-ac10"
Reply: Hubert Mantel: "Re: /proc/partitions hosed in 2.4.9-ac10"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 21:00:22 EST