Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.9

From: Robert Love (rml@ufl.edu)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 16:24:56 EST

Next message: Andy Isaacson: "Re: USB IRQ routing problems on Via Apollo Pro 133A"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] Defragmentation proposal: preventative maintenance and cleanup [LONG]"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "ext3-2.4-0.9.9"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.9"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

For reference, I am using 2.4.9-ac9 + ext3-0.9.9 + dir_speedup +
kpreempt with no problem. I have my root mounted as ext3, type ordered,
with a local journal.

I don't have any data points on performance gains, but I would be happy
to provide any if you specify what. Everything feels good.

I see no reason not to merge this into Alan's tree. At least
ext3-0.9.9, but the directory speedup seems reasonable enough too.

-- Robert M. Love rml at ufl.edu rml at tech9.net

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andy Isaacson: "Re: USB IRQ routing problems on Via Apollo Pro 133A"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] Defragmentation proposal: preventative maintenance and cleanup [LONG]"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "ext3-2.4-0.9.9"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.9"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:43 EST