Re: notion of a local address [was: Re: ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias

From: Wietse Venema (wietse@porcupine.org)
Date: Thu Sep 06 2001 - 11:45:50 EST


Alan Cox:
> > 127.0.0.2 is not local on any of my systems. The only exceptions
> > are some Linux boxen that I did not ask to do so.
>
> Todays reading is from RFC990 in the book of Reynolds & Postel, page number 6
>
> And the IETF spake thusly
>
> | The class A network number 127 is assigned the "loopback" function, that
> | is, a datagram sent by a higher level protocol to a network 127 address
> | should loop back inside the host. No datagram "sent" to a network 127
> | address should ever appear on any network anywhere.

That's routing.

I was talking about accepting connections. None of my systems
accepts connections on 127.0.0.2, except for a couple Linux boxen
that I did not ask to do so.

        Wietse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:36 EST