Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Thu Sep 06 2001 - 08:29:26 EST


On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Just use two limits:
> > * Time: After some time (say two seconds), we can always afford to write it
> > out=20
> > * Queue filling: After it has a certain size, it's worth doing a writing.
>
> Both debatable and both I can find counter cases for - think about a
> shared memory database with multiple game clients using it (eg the
> older AberMUD codebase). Writing that to disk is counterproductive

This is only for pages on the inactive_dirty list, though;
ie pages we want to evict from memory with the minimal amount
of work possible ;)

regards,

Rik

-- 
IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:35 EST