Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Thu Sep 06 2001 - 06:52:18 EST


On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Jan Harkes wrote:

> To get back on the thread I jumped into, I totally agree with Linus
> that writeout should be as soon as possible.

Nice way to destroy read performance. As DaveM noted so
nicely in his reverse mapping patch (at the end of the
2.3 series), dirty pages get moved to the laundry list
and the washing machine will deal with them when we have
a full load.

Lets face it, spinning the washing machine is expensive
and running less than a full load makes things inefficient ;)

cheers,

Rik

-- 
IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:34 EST