Re: [2.4.9 SMP] alloc_pages failed

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Sun Sep 02 2001 - 12:44:15 EST

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Rik`s ac12-pmap2 vs ac12-vanilla perfcomp"
Previous message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: [RFC] lazy allocation of struct block_device"
In reply to: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel: "Re: [2.4.9 SMP] alloc_pages failed"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [2.4.9 SMP] alloc_pages failed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On September 2, 2001 07:19 pm, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote:
> I think Daniel's two patches are the wrong way around. IE
> the second (labelled as the first) is the instrumentation
> to differentiate between different kinds of failure, and
> the first (labelled as the second) is the attempt to
> reserve extra pages for atomic allocations to reduce
> 0-order failures.

Yes, indeed - cut & paste error.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Rik`s ac12-pmap2 vs ac12-vanilla perfcomp"
Previous message: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: [RFC] lazy allocation of struct block_device"
In reply to: Alex Bligh - linux-kernel: "Re: [2.4.9 SMP] alloc_pages failed"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [2.4.9 SMP] alloc_pages failed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:15 EST