Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > One thing that goes away with rmaps is the need to scan process page tables.
> It's possible that this takes enough load off L1 cache to produce the effects
I feel like that.
actually there was a fear that the overhead of reverse map maintenance
will overthrow the gain on low loads, but in my case this isnt an issue.
> you showed, though it would be surprising.
>
> (Note that I'm in the "reverse maps are good" camp, and I think Rik's design
> is fundamentally correct.)
me too...
>
> --
> Daniel
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 21:00:15 EST