That doesn't sound right, Alan...
The constant in question is an upper-limit to the range of device versions
what get accepted. Narrowing the range can only break things -- making it
wider may not (necessarily) fix anything, but it does increase the scope of
the entry.
I'm guessing that someone meant to change it from something smaller than
either Andries' or the current value to where it is now, but the larger
value (i.e. Andries') is the proper one.
Matt
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 11:19:01PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > but not with 2.4.9, I noticed that my name was added and some
> > constant changed. Changing it back revived my CF reader.
>
> Yes you added the entry, someone changed the constant as it didnt work
> for them, now you change it back.
>
> I suspect both constants should be in 8)
-- Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage DriverWe can customize our colonels. -- Tux User Friendly, 12/1/1998
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:36 EST