On August 25, 2001 03:34 am, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > My point is, even with the case you supplied the expected behaviour of
> > the existing algorithm is acceptable. There is no burning fire to put
> > out, not here anyway.
>
> True, it's just an issue of performance and heavily used
> servers falling over under load, nothing as serious as
> data corruption or system instability.
If your server is falling over under load, this is not the reason.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 21:00:18 EST