Re: Use-once change and inactive shortage calculation

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Jul 30 2001 - 17:17:04 EST

Next message: Bill Pringlemeir: "Re: [CFT] initramfs patch"
Previous message: Jan Nieuwenhuizen: "Re: Test mail"
In reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "Use-once change and inactive shortage calculation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

> The best solution, IMO, is to unlazy queue movement. Doing this would
> result in accurate inactive/free information.

We won't know until we try, but I think it's a good
thing to try...

regards,

Rik

-- Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release: "we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL)"

http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bill Pringlemeir: "Re: [CFT] initramfs patch"
Previous message: Jan Nieuwenhuizen: "Re: Test mail"
In reply to: Marcelo Tosatti: "Use-once change and inactive shortage calculation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 21:00:47 EST