Re: [PATCH] [IMPORTANT] Re: 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness.

Date: Sun Jul 29 2001 - 12:52:11 EST


> I think the latency issue was really the fact that we weren't always
> running softirqs in a timely fashion after they had been disabled by a
> "disable_bh()". That is fixed with the new softirq stuff, regardless of
> the other issues.

I hope too. Actually, this observation was main argument pro ksoftirqd
and against instant restart. Ingo objected but finally the issue was buried...
or I lost discussion not reading maillists for some time.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 21:00:41 EST