Re: [PATCH] [IMPORTANT] Re: 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness.

From: Alexey Kuznetsov (
Date: Sat Jul 28 2001 - 18:28:00 EST


> yes, ksoftirqd should just avoid you to eat all the cpu

I see now, you completely killed dead loops from Ingo's patch!
It is your original approach and I am happy with it.

Before falling to euforia, the last question:
Is Ingo really happy with this? He blamed about latency,
it is not better than in 2.4.5 (with cpu_idle fix) :-)

> I hope I didn't misunderstood the question in such case please correct
> me.

You really misunderstood this a bit, but solely because the question
was meaningless in context of 2.4.7. My apologies. :-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 21:00:41 EST