Re: 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness.

Date: Fri Jul 27 2001 - 13:59:14 EST


> Applied to 2.4.8-pre1. Didn't make any difference.

Yes, that hole is mostly theoretical. At least, on intel. Seems, gcc is still
not enough clever to reorder atomic operations.

> Also it doesn't fix the scenario that I described (reschedule while running). I'm still wondering why don't I hit that trylock/BUG
> in tasklet_action.

How old the problem is? Was it always present?

To be honest, this is too strong bug to believe to this at all. :-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 21:00:34 EST