Re: Weird ext2fs immortal directory bug (all-in-one)

From: Andreas Dilger (adilger@turbolinux.com)
Date: Thu Jul 26 2001 - 13:21:04 EST


Chris Wing writes:
> I am assuming that the problem here was that fsck restored a lost inode to
> lost+found, but the inode had been corrupted and had the immutable bit
> set.
>
> At the very least, ext2 fsck should complain about ext2 attributes set for
> symlinks or device files... I have had this same problem myself many times
> on machines with bad SCSI termination- I end up with unremovable device
> files thanks to a bogus immutable bit and have to use debugfs to get rid
> of them.

It should actually assume that such inodes are corrupt, and either just
delete them at e2fsck time, or at least clear the "bad" parts of the inode
before sticking it in lost+found.

Cheers, Andreas

PS - I CC'd Ted on this, as he can probably fix this a lot faster than I
     (I may be able to fix it during another OLS presentation today or
     tomorrow).

-- 
Andreas Dilger                               Turbolinux filesystem development
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 21:00:29 EST