Re: OT: Journaling FS Comparison

From: Hans Reiser (
Date: Sun Jul 22 2001 - 13:59:42 EST

Ian Chilton wrote:
> I also heard that ReiserFS is the fastest out of the bunch, but all
> data is lost on converstion, and obviously rescuing and moving disks is
> harder. But, it is in the main kernel tree..
tar works....:-) and it has the advantage that you don't have to worry about a bug in the
conversion program, which was always the thing I feared enough to keep us from writing such a
conversion program.

The last ReiserFS patch for NFS in Linux 2.4 seems to have resulted in no more complaints regarding
nfs and reiserfs used in combination since it went in. It went in quite recently though.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 23 2001 - 21:00:15 EST