Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*}

From: Dan Hollis (
Date: Tue Jul 17 2001 - 19:58:52 EST

On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Jussi Laako wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > We are not that far away from being able to handle 8K blocks, so that
> > would bump it up to 32 TB.
> That's way too small. Something like 32 PB would be better... ;)
> We need at least one extra bit in volume/file size every year.

volume size grows faster than file size, doesn't it? maybe extra bit of
volume and 1/2 bit file size per year...


[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to More majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 23 2001 - 21:00:09 EST