Re: SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 13 2001 - 05:44:08 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Again: Linux 2.4.x and AMD Athlon"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: Re[2]: Question about ext2"
In reply to: Tim Hockin: "SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> We have a request to bump up SOMAXCONN. Are there are repurcussions to
> doing so? Would it be better to make it a sysctl?

Its pretty meaningless as a value. People who say they need a larger
SOMAXCONN are as a general rule simply wrong in the Linux case

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Again: Linux 2.4.x and AMD Athlon"
Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: Re[2]: Question about ext2"
In reply to: Tim Hockin: "SOMAXCONN - bump up or sysctl?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST