Jeff Golds wrote:
>
> So what's wrong with collecting the slaves' receive stats and reporting
> them as stats for the bonding driver? At least then you can quickly see
> the total for all devices currently owned by the bonding device.
>
> Stats are just a tool so that you can see if things are behaving
> properly, you can report back whatever you like. I prefer to have the
> bonding driver collect the slaves' stats so you can easily see if
> enslaved devices are receiving packets. If you want to see which device
> is getting more traffic, that's easy to see by looking at the individual
> slave.
>
the person who ported the driver over to 2.4 from 2.2 made that choice.
It wasn't me. It was one of the network guys (Dave/Alexy/??).
One problem with collecting all the stats into the bonding driver -
which I have seen, is you can quickly start to overflow counters. And
they don't roll over.
-- ------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Thomas Davis | ASG Cluster guy tadavis@lbl.gov | (510) 486-4524 | "80 nodes and chugging Captain!" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 21:00:17 EST