On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:22:16AM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Imagine if somebody gives you a 1Gb directory. Would it or would
it not piss you off if your file pointer got reset to 0 every time
somebody created a file?
The current semantics are scalable. Anything which resets the file
pointer upon change of a file/directory/whatever isn't...
Anyone using a 1GB directory deserves for it not to scale. I think
this is a very poor example.
No that I disagree with you, the largest directories I have on my
system here are 2.6MB (freedb, lots of hashed flat-files in one
directory), here I do agree that you should not have to reset the
counter everytime.
--cw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 21:00:11 EST