Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > instead. That way the vmstat output might be more useful, although vmstat
> > > obviously won't know about the new "SwapCache:" field..
> > >
> > > Can you try that, and see if something else stands out once the misleading
> > > accounting is taken care of?
> >
> > Its certainly misleading. I got Jeff to try making oom return
> > 4999 out of 5000 times regardless.
>
> In that case, he _is_ OOM. ;)
>
> 1) (almost) no free memory
> 2) no free swap
> 3) very little pagecache + buffer cache
It got -considerably- farther after Alan's suggested hack to the OOM
killer; so at least in this instance, OOM killer appeared to me to be
killing too early...
-- Jeff Garzik | A recent study has shown that too much soup Building 1024 | can cause malaise in laboratory mice. MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 07 2001 - 21:00:21 EST