Re: Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("")

• Next message: Henry: "Re: OOPS (kswapd) in 2.4.5 and 2.4.6"
• Previous message: linux@horizon.com: "What's the status of kernel PNP?"
• Maybe in reply to: Rick Hohensee: "Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("")"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I replied to davem at length but I think I forgot to "reply to all
recipients". The gist of it is Forth code density is so high on Forth
hardware that things like icaches aren't as important, and the factors
involved are entirely different. Like high-performance Forth engines
are tiny and draw negligible current. Two URL's...

        http://forth.gsfc.nasa.gov/
        http://www.mindspring.com/chipchuck/forth.html

Rick Hohensee
                www.clienux.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Henry: "Re: OOPS (kswapd) in 2.4.5 and 2.4.6"
• Previous message: linux@horizon.com: "What's the status of kernel PNP?"
• Maybe in reply to: Rick Hohensee: "Why Plan 9 C compilers don't have asm("")"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 07 2001 - 21:00:20 EST