Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers

• Next message: Jay Thorne: "[OOPS] 2.4.5-anything Alpha, SMP"
• Previous message: Rob Landley: "Re: The latest Microsoft FUD. This time from BillG, himself."
• In reply to: Mike Mackovitch: "Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers"
• Next in thread: Mike Mackovitch: "Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers"
• Reply: Mike Mackovitch: "Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mike Mackovitch writes:
> Sorry, but SGI's IRIX does NOT handle graphics interrupts in user space.

What the heck is ULI then? I've actually read the assembly code for
this back when I did my SGI internship.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Jay Thorne: "[OOPS] 2.4.5-anything Alpha, SMP"
• Previous message: Rob Landley: "Re: The latest Microsoft FUD. This time from BillG, himself."
• In reply to: Mike Mackovitch: "Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers"
• Next in thread: Mike Mackovitch: "Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers"
• Reply: Mike Mackovitch: "Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 23 2001 - 21:00:36 EST