Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Thu Jun 14 2001 - 10:33:29 EST

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Download process for a "split kernel" (was: obsolete code must die)"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses"
Next in thread: Jonathan Lundell: "Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Pretty much any arch with a PCI slot can have multiple domains, now that
> hotplug controllers are out and about. So it seems a generic enough
> concept to me...

Um, correction: that is assuming a certain implementation... you can
certainly implement a hotplug controller as another PCI-PCI bridge,
AFAICS, too.

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Andre the Giant has a posse.
Building 1024    |
MandrakeSoft     |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: Download process for a "split kernel" (was: obsolete code must die)"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses"
Next in thread: Jonathan Lundell: "Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 15 2001 - 21:00:22 EST