Re: [patch] 2.4.6-pre3 unresolved symbol do_softirq

From: Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Date: Wed Jun 13 2001 - 09:37:23 EST


On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:15:31 -0700 (PDT),
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
>Surely this is a smaller hammer than making them all NOVERS(), I
>think all of these workarounds with novers for assembly are silly and
>are merely looking for a solution which nobody (perhaps except me :-)
>is bothering to look for.

modversions.h will disappear in 2.5 anyway, and be replaced with a
cleaner system of symbol versions which does not rely on pre-processor
fudging of symbol names. It should be able to handle assembler as well
as C.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 15 2001 - 21:00:18 EST