RE: Validating dynamically allocated kernel memory

From: Anil Kumar (anilk@subexgroup.com)
Date: Mon Jun 11 2001 - 07:54:39 EST

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: jffs on non-MTD device?"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [patch] sys_modify_ldt extension (default_ldt)"
In reply to: kiran.thirumalai@in.ibm.com: "Validating dynamically allocated kernel memory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

try "sys_mprotect" with neccessary bit patterns set i.e, read/write/exec
type of protection check.

anil

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of
kiran.thirumalai@in.ibm.com
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 5:12 PM
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Validating dynamically allocated kernel memory

Hi,
Is there some kernel api to validate memory allocated using kmalloc.
Suppose, I allocate some memory using kmalloc and at a later point of
execution
I would like to validate if the memory allocated is not possibly freed by
some other thread.

Pls suggest a patch/pointers if any.
I also noticed a commented 'CONFIG_DEBUG_MALLOC' config option (2.4.3
source),
It doesn't seem to be functional. Any pointers towards the history behind
it would also be helpful.

Thanks in advance,
Kiran

PS: My previous post went through minus subject due to oversight
:-(...Apologising and resending ....

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: jffs on non-MTD device?"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [patch] sys_modify_ldt extension (default_ldt)"
In reply to: kiran.thirumalai@in.ibm.com: "Validating dynamically allocated kernel memory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 15 2001 - 21:00:13 EST