Re: Is Kernel2.2 is SMP versioned by default?

From: Robert Love (rml@ufl.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 08 2001 - 17:56:39 EST

Next message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: Linux kernel headers violate RFC2553"
Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister table"
In reply to: jalaja devi: "Is Kernel2.2 is SMP versioned by default?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 08 Jun 2001 07:58:48 -0700, jalaja devi wrote:
> Hi,
> Could anyone plz tell me whether the kernel - 2.2.14
> is SMP or NON-SMP by default?
> To make it SMP versioned, Do I need to add some flags
> in the kernel header files and re-compile to kernel?

i actually think it may be SMP (for whatever odd reason).
you need to configure and compile the kernel, anyhow.
select from one of:

make config (text)
make menuconfig (curses)
make xconfig (Tk)

and make sure SMP is enabled, as well as support for the rest of your
hardware and the features you want.

then: make dep clean bzImage modules

see the Kernel Compile HOWTO

-- Robert M. Love rml@ufl.edu rml@tech9.net

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Oliver Xymoron: "Re: Linux kernel headers violate RFC2553"
Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [PATCH] sockreg2.4.5-05 inet[6]_create() register/unregister table"
In reply to: jalaja devi: "Is Kernel2.2 is SMP versioned by default?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 15 2001 - 21:00:10 EST