Re: [CHECKER] 2.4.5-ac4 non-init functions calling init functions

From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Date: Thu May 31 2001 - 02:09:05 EST

Next message: D. Stimits: "missing sysrq"
Previous message: Yiping Chen: "RE: via-rhine DFE-530TX rev A1"
In reply to: Dawson Engler: "Re: [CHECKER] 2.4.5-ac4 non-init functions calling init functions"
Next in thread: Harald Welte: "Re: [CHECKER] 2.4.5-ac4 non-init functions calling init functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

engler@csl.Stanford.EDU said:
> It's a space/performance bug, though, right? From the original mail:
> 1. The best case: the caller should actually be an __init function
> as well. This is a performance bug since it won't be freed.

Yes, sorry. I hadn't properly read the beginning or your mail - I'd skipped
straight to checking whether anything I own had been listed. :)

-- dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: D. Stimits: "missing sysrq"
Previous message: Yiping Chen: "RE: via-rhine DFE-530TX rev A1"
In reply to: Dawson Engler: "Re: [CHECKER] 2.4.5-ac4 non-init functions calling init functions"
Next in thread: Harald Welte: "Re: [CHECKER] 2.4.5-ac4 non-init functions calling init functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 31 2001 - 21:00:50 EST