On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 04:50:28PM +0200, christophe barbé wrote:
> I don't know about socket but I allocate myself the skbuff and I set the
> destructor (and previously the pointer value is NULL). So I don't overwrite
> a destructor.
That just means you didn't test all cases; e.g. not TCP or UDP send/receive.
>
> I believe net/core/sock.c is not involved in my problem but I can be wrong.
> What is worrying me is that I don't know who clones my skbuff and why.
skbuffs are cloned all over the stack for various reasons.
> To said everything, I know who clones my skbuff because it causes a oops
> when it tries to free my buffer If I use my destructor.
Because you're mistakely using a private field.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:52 EST