Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon May 21 2001 - 07:31:10 EST


> > 2) Have a HACKERS submenu system which contains all the derivations
> > that could *possibly* be un-defaulted, and allow our intrepid hacker
> > to explicitly force each to a value or leave unset.
>
> I prefer the former, which is how it's already implemented in CML1.

Its called Debugging in CML1 in -ac for a reason btw. Because its called
debugging I get plenty of reports that start

"I dont know much about this but I turned on all the debugging options and now
 instead of hanging it says Oops 0xA5A5A5A5 ..."

which are a lot more useful.

Names matter a lot

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:41 EST