Re: no ioctls for serial ports? [was Re: LANANA: To Pending DeviceNumberRegistrants]

From: John Fremlin (vii@users.sourceforge.net)
Date: Sun May 20 2001 - 12:17:57 EST

Next message: David Osojnik: "tcp_mem problem"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: start_thread question..."
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: no ioctls for serial ports? [was Re: LANANA: To Pending DeviceNumberRegistrants]"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: no ioctls for serial ports? [was Re: LANANA: To Pending DeviceNumberRegistrants]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> writes:

[...]

> We have ~180 first-order ioctl() methods. Several (my guess would be

Hehe. I suppose you already know about the way strace (@sourceforge)
kind of automatically tries to figure out the args for the common
ones?

[...]

--

http://ape.n3.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Osojnik: "tcp_mem problem"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: start_thread question..."
In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: no ioctls for serial ports? [was Re: LANANA: To Pending DeviceNumberRegistrants]"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: no ioctls for serial ports? [was Re: LANANA: To Pending DeviceNumberRegistrants]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:37 EST