Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up

From: Eric S. Raymond (esr@thyrsus.com)
Date: Fri May 18 2001 - 12:41:04 EST


Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
> What I am trying to say is that if you can infer probable configuration
> categories that are relevant then instead of automatically filling the other
> areas in and blocking changing them without using vi you can put the other
> options as a submenu. That guides the less expert user and also helps rather
> than hinders the expert

OK, that's useful input. Noted.

There's a bit of a technical problem with the distinction between
derivations (which are like macros) and question symbols (which can
be suppressed or unsuppressed depending on their visibility predicate
But perhaps I can think up a solution to that one over lunch.

-- 
		<a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

You [should] not examine legislation in the light of the benefits it will convey if properly administered, but in the light of the wrongs it would do and the harm it would cause if improperly administered -- Lyndon Johnson, former President of the U.S. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:29 EST