2.2, 2.4 bug in sock_no_fcntl()/F_SETOWN? (fwd)

From: Chris Evans (chris@scary.beasts.org)
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 17:53:45 EST


Resend (no response first time)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 21:09:09 +0000 (GMT)
From: Chris Evans <chris@scary.beasts.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@redhat.com
Subject: 2.2, 2.4 bug in sock_no_fcntl()/F_SETOWN?

Hi,

Looking at the code for sock_no_fcntl() in net/core.c, I cannot specify
"0" as a value for F_SETOWN, unless I'm the superuser. I believe this to
be a bug, it stops de-registering an interest in SIGURG signals. Let me
know if you want a patch.

Cheers
Chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:25 EST