Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10

From: Matti Aarnio (matti.aarnio@zmailer.org)
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 13:51:33 EST


On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:40:39PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 08:33:36PM +0200, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
> > With 2.4.4-ac10 and binutils 2.11 I get the following warnings:
>
> It is a warning about kernel code using assembler statements
> which are not valid with some older assemblers.

  Naeh, I am confusing (you, and myself). Fixing those (adding the '*')
  would not work with some older assemblers.

  Claiming minimum level of 2.10/2.11 for assembler/binutils would
  certainly allow fixing things by adding the missing '*'.

> > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.4-ac/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -malign-functions=4 -c -o pci-pc.o pci-pc.c
> > pci-pc.c:964: warning: `pci_fixup_via691' defined but not used
> > pci-pc.c:977: warning: `pci_fixup_via691_2' defined but not used
> > {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> > {standard input}:747: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> > {standard input}:832: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> > {standard input}:919: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
> > {standard input}:958: Warning: indirect lcall without `*'
...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:24 EST