On 16 May 2001, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> Why do you use ramfs? Most of it is duplicated in tmpfs and ramfs is a
> minimal _example_ fs. There was some agreement that this should stay
> so.
Because what I need is an absolute minimum. Heck, I don't even use
regular files (in the full variant of patch, that is). They might
become useful, but I can live with mkdir() and mknod(). Moreover,
I want it mounted very early. Right now I'm doing that after initcalls,
but there's a very good reason to move the thing as early as possible.
So the fewer things it uses - the better.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST