Christoph Rohland wrote:
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Wed, 16 May 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Looks ok, but it also feels like 2.5.x stuff to me.
> >
> > Also, there's the question of whether to make ramfs just built-in,
> > or make _tmpfs_ built in - ramfs is certainly simpler, but tmpfs
> > does the same things and you need that one for shared mappings etc.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> cr:/speicher/src/u4ac9 $ ls -l mm/shmem.o*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 cr users 154652 Mai 16 19:27 mm/shmem.o-tmpfs
> -rw-r--r-- 1 cr users 180764 Mai 16 19:24 mm/shmem.o+tmpfs
> cr:/speicher/src/u4ac9 $ ls -l fs/ramfs/ramfs.o
> -rw-r--r-- 1 cr users 141452 Mai 16 19:27 fs/ramfs/ramfs.o
>
> So CONFIG_TMPFS adds 26k and ramfs 140k.
On what system? I don't think this is a good measure...
> [jgarzik@rum linux_2_4]$ ls -l fs/ramfs/ramfs.o
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jgarzik jgarzik 5830 May 15 09:29 fs/ramfs/ramfs.o
> [jgarzik@rum linux_2_4]$ ls -l mm/shmem.o (includes tmpfs)
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jgarzik jgarzik 17496 May 15 09:28 mm/shmem.o
-- Jeff Garzik | Game called on account of naked chick Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:18 EST