Re: 2.4 To Pending Device Number Registrants

• Next message: Dave Cecil: "Tracing a network device"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: LANANA: Getting out of hand?"
• In reply to: bert hubert: "2.4 To Pending Device Number Registrants"
• Next in thread: bert hubert: "Re: 2.4 To Pending Device Number Registrants"
• Reply: bert hubert: "Re: 2.4 To Pending Device Number Registrants"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> So I would think that this block of new major number allocations holds for
> 2.5 and not 2.4. Also, if I'm correct, 2.4 won't be needing a lot of new
> major numbers anyhow.

I wouldnt bet on that. Going to a 32bit dev_t internally without user space
noticing would keep it seems to be quite doable if we have to. Right now doesnt
worry me, in 2 years time when 2.6 is approaching release the picture might
have changed a fair bit

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Dave Cecil: "Tracing a network device"
• Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: LANANA: Getting out of hand?"
• In reply to: bert hubert: "2.4 To Pending Device Number Registrants"
• Next in thread: bert hubert: "Re: 2.4 To Pending Device Number Registrants"
• Reply: bert hubert: "Re: 2.4 To Pending Device Number Registrants"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 15 2001 - 21:00:40 EST