Re: LVM 1.0 release decision

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@caldera.de)
Date: Sun May 13 2001 - 14:25:49 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: page_launder() bug"
Previous message: Christian Bornträger : "Re: Latest on Athlon Via KT133A chipset solution?"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: LVM 1.0 release decision"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: LVM 1.0 release decision"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:36:11PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> IMHO, no 64-bit architecture code should provide translation functions for
> ioctls from 32-bit binaries.
>
> This is now a sufficiently common requirement that it shouldn't be repeated
> by all architectures that require it - it should be somewhere common.
> Like linux/abi/ioctl32/

Better linux/abi/linux32 and have other 32/64-bit stuff there too.
At least the binfmt_elf32 stuff should be made MI, IMHO.

Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: page_launder() bug"
Previous message: Christian Bornträger : "Re: Latest on Athlon Via KT133A chipset solution?"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: LVM 1.0 release decision"
Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: LVM 1.0 release decision"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 15 2001 - 21:00:32 EST