> If the free software community understood and accepted this, by the
way,
> then I think that it removes the need for the LGPL, it's redundant.
What is when compiling a DOS/DJGPP programme? IIRC it is statically
linked
to the libc-dos. IIRC the LGPL here prevents the remaining DOS programme
code
to be GPL'ed too.
I'm neither a lawyer, but this is the difference as I understood.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
-mirabilos
-- EA F0 FF 00 F0 #$@%CARRIER LOST- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 15 2001 - 21:00:20 EST