Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench
From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed May 09 2001 - 12:39:01 EST
- Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- Previous message: Andrew M. Theurer: "Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- In reply to: Andrew M. Theurer: "Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- Next in thread: Andrew M. Theurer: "Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- Reply: Andrew M. Theurer: "Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- Reply: Chris Evans: "Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
> significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
Are you using Antons optimisations to samba to use sendfile ?
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- Previous message: Andrew M. Theurer: "Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- In reply to: Andrew M. Theurer: "Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- Next in thread: Andrew M. Theurer: "Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- Reply: Andrew M. Theurer: "Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- Reply: Chris Evans: "Re: Linux 2.4 Scalability, Samba, and Netbench"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Tue May 15 2001 - 21:00:20 EST