On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 03:24:25PM +0200, you [Ingo Molnar] claimed:
>
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Ville Herva wrote:
>
> > Uhh, perhaps I'm stupid, but why not cache the date field and update
> > the field once a five seconds? Or even once a second?
>
> perhaps the best way would be to do this updating in the sending code
> itself.
>
> first there would be a 'current time thread', which updates a global
> shared variable that shows the current time. (ie. no extra system-call is
> needed to access current time.) If the header-sending code detects that
> current time is not equal to the timestamp stored in the header itself,
> then the header is reconstructed. Pretty simple.
Yes, that's vaguely resembles what I had in mind. Of course I had no idea
about the data structures Tux or X15 use internally, so I couldn't think it
too thoroughly.
-- v --
v@iki.fi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:20 EST