Re: 2.4 and 2GB swap partition limit

From: Rogier Wolff (R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl)
Date: Sat Apr 28 2001 - 08:17:01 EST


Wakko Warner wrote:
> > I've always been trying to convice people that 2x RAM remains a good
> > rule-of-thumb.
>
> IMO this is pointless
>
> total used free shared buffers cached
> Mem: 517456 505332 12124 111016 97752 236884
> -/+ buffers/cache: 170696 346760
> Swap: 131048 23216 107832
>
> Of course for me, I'm not about to waste 1gb of disk space for swap.
>
> The swap I have is 2 partitions, one on each drive both with a priority of
> 0. Personally, I like the way it's done on my box.

So you've spent almost $200 for RAM, and refuse to spend $4 for 1Gb of
swap space. Fine with me.

                        Roger.

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. 
* There are also old, bald pilots. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:20 EST