Fabio,
i noticed one weirdness in the Date-field handling of X15. X15 appears to
cache the Date field too, which is contrary to RFCs:
earth2:~> wget -s http://localhost/index.html -O - 2>/dev/null | grep Date
Date: Sat Apr 28 10:15:14 2001
earth2:~> date
Sat Apr 28 10:32:40 CEST 2001
ie. there is already a 15 minutes difference between the 'origin date of
the reply' and the actual date of the reply. (i started X15 up 15 minutes
ago.)
per RFC 2616:
.............
The Date general-header field represents the date and time at which the
message was originated, [...]
Origin servers MUST include a Date header field in all responses, [...]
.............
i considered the caching of the Date field for TUX too, and avoided it
exactly due to this issue, to not violate this 'MUST' item in the RFC. It
can be reasonably expected from a web server to have a 1-second accurate
Date: field.
the header-caching in X15 gives it an edge against TUX, obviously, but IMO
it's a questionable practice.
if caching of headers was be allowed then we could the obvious trick of
sendfile()ing complete web replies (first header, then body).
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:00:20 EST